earticle

논문검색

Relative Importance Analysis of inter-evaluation items in Korean IS Standard Audit Checklist Using Decision making Techniques

원문정보

초록

영어

Korean Government has introduced and legislated IS Audit System since 2006. IS audit is executed by auditors on the basis of standard audit checklist. As IT environment and technology are rapidly changing, it is inevitable that the improvement of the audit quality is followed by change or modification of items in standard audit checklist. To do this, this paper applied AHP and MOGSA decision making techniques and drew weights and priority of inter-items in standard audit checklist. Derived weights and priority can be used as a basis to modify and change evaluation items in standard audit checklist. The same priority has been obtained from used two methods and two decision makers’ groups. As a result, it was demonstrated that derived priority has high reliability.

목차

Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Standard Audit Checklist by IS Project Type
 3. Hierarchical Decision Making Techniques
  3.1. AHP Model
  3.2. Calculation of Relative Weights
 4. Results and Analysis
 5. Conclusion
 References

저자정보

  • Boo-Hyung Lee Kongju National University

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.