earticle

논문검색

《설문해자(說文解字)》의 사론(䛐論) 연구 - ‘사(䛐)’자 풀이에 드러난 ‘의(意)’와 ‘언(言)’의 관계-

원문정보

On the theory and meaning of ‘ci(䛐)’ in Shuowenjiezi說文解字

염정삼

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

In his postscript敘 Shuowenjiezi說文解字, Xushen許愼 suggested character writing, Wen文, as the fundamental source in linguistic activities and emphasized the perpetuity of Wen文, being irrelevant to time and place. His idea had been basically succeeded from Han dynasty. He insisted that Wen文 would not change its essence, even though cangxie倉頡's shuxie書契, letter inscriptions, had been developed into various styles of writings which were called shuti書體, and they would change through time. Thanks to Xushen, the Chinese civilization was able to have its unique character writing system and studies of characters. However, intentions and thoughts cannot be accurately expressed merely by images, figures, and shapes. Vocal sound and speaking are also essential in the process of communication. Would a delicate and exquisite character writing system be sufficient enough to solve this problem? Xushen might have been perplexed confronting this question. We can find traces of his intellectual suffering in his book Shuowenjiezi說文解字, which focuses on explaining each and every character in detail. A typical example would be the character ‘ci䛐’ and the words that include it. By focusing on the usage of ci䛐, this article aims to explain the process in establishing Xushen’s theory.

목차

1. 들어가며
  1.1 문자(文字) 중심의 언어론
  1.2 ‘쓴다[書]’는 것의 의미
 2. 허신이 설명하는 ‘사(䛐)’
  2.1 ‘사(䛐)’를 이용하여 설명되는 문자들
  2.2 ‘사(䛐)’자의 정의
 3. 《묵경(墨經)》의 언어론과 어떻게 다른가
  3.1 ‘저명(著明)’과 ‘설명(說明)’의 차이
  3.2 묵가의 의(意)와 허신의 의(意)
 4. ‘문자(文字)’를 통한 의미 표현-단옥재 주석을 통하여
  4.1 의(意)와 언(言)의 관계
  4.2 사(䛐)와 사(辭)의 관계
 5. 결론을 대신하여
 參考文獻
 Abstract

저자정보

  • 염정삼 서울대학교 중어중문학과 강사.

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.