원문정보
초록
영어
The concept of expectation rights considers 'the expectation' that the patient should be given proper medical treatment as the benefit and protection of the law, so it would be the benefit and protection of the law due to personal rights different from 'the legal principle that has the possibility to a considerable extent' being in an extension of life and body. However, the problem how the patient's expectation of medical service sets up in order to make it the benefit and protection of the law would be still left in the vague concept of the patient's 'expectation', thus, in the first place, the medical practice following formed medical standard in every particular medical institutes should be the standard because these medical services are normally within a range of the patients' expectations. In addition, it should be naturally constituted as mental profit to get the subjective circumstances such as 'the patient's expectation' to be an object, and also, different from the profit and protection of the law such as life and body that should be absolutely protected, the origin of violation behavior should be regarded simultaneously to define the denotation of expectation rights. Therefore, the expectation rights violations would be problematic in case it fails to reach the medical standard that is expected for common doctors to practice properly. This is the concept of expectation rights that gets subjective matters such as the patient's expectation to be objectivity as medical practices that can be expected by generalized abstract doctors. This standard should be defined as the minimum standard that is naturally expected for doctors to practice, different from medical standard that decides the level of doctors.
목차
II. 일본 최고재판소의 '환자의 기대' 보호와 '상당정도의 가능성' 이론
1. 종전의 일본 최고재판소 판례
2. 일본 최고재판소 2011년 판결
III. 환자의 기대보호의 법률적 구성
1. 문제해결의 두 가지 측면
2. 의료행위상의 인과관계의 증명문제와 기대권침해론
3. 보호법익과 기대권침해론
4. 검토
IV. 기대권 개념의 법적 지위
1. '기대권'의 피침해법익으로서의 승인문제
2. 기대권 개념의 위치
V. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
