earticle

논문검색

불법행위책임에 있어서의 인과관계 - PETL을 중심으로

원문정보

Cause in torts responsibility - focused on PETL

이혜리

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

It might be hard to distinguish the cause-in-fact and proximate cause, however, in our Civil Code, there is separate provision for the establishment of liability and the scope of the liability so it is fair to make such distinction. In determining the cause-in-fact, but-for test should be applied in order to withdraw the fast and clear conclusion. However, the proximate cause should not be considered as an issue related to merely causation because it is not possibile to limit the scope of liability only by the causation.
Since the tort law's purpose, to distribute the liability in the fair way can be achieved when we determine the proximate cause, therefore, we should consider many factors in stead of choosing one doctrine. In this aspect, Principle of European Tort Law provides interesting standards on the causation theory.

목차

I. 서설
 Ⅱ. 유럽불법행위법 원칙에서 인과관계의 규율
  1. 개관
  2. 사실적 인과관계
  3. 배상책임의 귀속과 범위
 Ⅲ. 우리나라의 인과관계 관련 법규 및 이론
  1. 기본적 체계
  2. 책임성립의 인과관계와 배상범위의 인과관계의 구분 여부
  3. 책임성립의 인과관계의 개념
  4. 인과관계의 개념이나 입증도에 유연성을 부여하는 견해들
  5. 책임범위의 제한 - 민법 제313조의 해석론
 III. 결어 - 유럽불법행위법 원칙이 우리 법제에 주는 시사점
 [참고문헌]
 

저자정보

  • 이혜리 Lee, Hye-Ri. 동국대학교 법과대학 조교수

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 7,500원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.