earticle

영어

The objective of this study is to compare and verify perceptions of suppliers and beneficiaries in the aspect of policy/system, business/economy and social economy, focusing on residential environment improvement projects in Mapo-gu and Gwangjin-gu of Seoul. By extracting variables to evaluate effectiveness from the precedent studies and cases of analyzing the effect of residential environment improvement projects and then classifying them into the aspect of policy/system, business/economy and social economy on the basis of analysis frame, we asked experts and the persons concerned about the extracted/classified variables and then conducted comparison analysis of perceptions on them. In order to verify the research questions of this study, we calculated the average scores of the perception of the supplier and beneficiary groups for each subordinate variable. Also t-test was conducted to examine the differences of perception between two groups. In the results, first, the average scores of the beneficiary group and supplier group were 3.40 and 4.00 respectively for the questions about policy goals in the aspect of policy/system, which was analyzed that both groups perceived them positively. And there were differences of perception between both groups. Since the average scores of the beneficiary group and supplier group were 3.65 and 4.17 respectively for the questions about taking actions against problems, it was analyzed that both groups perceived them positively. And it was shown that there were differences of perception between both groups. As the average scores of the beneficiary group and supplier group were 3.65 and 3.97 respectively for the questions about perception of housing policies, it was analyzed that both groups perceived them positively. And there were no differences of perception between two groups. Second, the average scores of the beneficiary group and supplier group were 3.70 and 3.95 for the questions about individual economic effect in the aspect of business/ economy, which was analyzed that both groups perceived them positively. And there were no differences of perception between two groups. Since the average scores of the beneficiary group and supplier group were 3.45 and 3.83 for the questions about social economic effect, it was analyzed that both groups perceived them positively. And it was shown that there were differences of perception between two groups. Third, both groups generally showed low perception on the degree of individual residential environment improvement in the aspect of social environment. The results of t-test conducted to examine the differences of perception between two groups found low average scores of the supplier group while there were no statistically significant differences. The perception of both groups on the degree of social residential environment improvement was mostly very low while the supplier group showed a little less differences than the beneficiary group. The results of t-test conducted to examine differences of perception between two groups found low average scores of the supplier group and also showed statistically significant differences.