earticle

논문검색

연구논문

자백과 보강증거 - 판례를 중심으로 -

원문정보

Confessions and Corroborating Evidence - Focused on Judicial Precedents -

김덕중

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

A judge cannot convict a defendant of guilty despite judge's belief in the guilt of the defendant based on the confession with admissibility of evidence and credible confession unless there is corroborating evidence. This is an exception to the principle of free evaluation of evidence restricting admissibility of evidence and originates from a need to prevent misjudgement and to protect human rights. On the other hand, as for the corroborating evidence, judicial precedents support the theory of veracity security "the degree of veracity ensuring the veracity of the confession" in respect of the issue 'how much the corroborating evidence shall corroborate the confession. However, its standard is so abstract that the supplement to this is required.

목차

Ⅰ. 논점의 정리
 Ⅱ. 보강증거를 필요로 하는 자백
 Ⅲ. 보강증거의 자격
 Ⅳ. 보강증거의 적용범위
 Ⅴ. 맺음말
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

저자정보

  • 김덕중 Kim, Deok-Jung. 원광대학교 법학전문대학원 부교수, 법학연구소 연구위원, 법학박사, 변호사.

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.