earticle

영어

The purpose of this thesis is to study Tae-Yong Jung’s earlier literary criticism with attention to the origin of his criticism and to turn out the achievement and limitation in view of criticism history. In addition, the analysis of his criticism in the context of Independence period and the 1950s were investigated and reconstructed in the meaning of criticism history. Tae-Yong Jung’s earlier literary criticism were oriented closer at the national reality and life and were to reconstruct ‘the national literature’ through full-fledged practice criticism. His early criticism sought the best ways to explore the goals of national literature, out of the conflict of Left-wing and right-wing, medium wave after the liberation. They overcame lack of ‘ethnic’ and ‘reality’ in the 1950s criticism. In particular, his criticism emphasized the subjective perception and Showed the balanced perspective on the ‘literary’ and ‘reality’. Furthermore, his practice criticism analyzed and evaluated insightfully contemporary literature as well as the past literature in point of literary history. they presented the future direction of Korea Literature. On the other hand, because Tae-Yong Jung emphasized the reality or the life of the nation, he was underestimated the young writers and critics in the 1950s, Sang Lee, gi-rim Kim. Also he revealed the real attitude of practical criticism compared to other established literary critics, but he was less professional than young critics had excellent literary theory. These critical awareness and practice had left many achievements Through ongoing critical activity. Many achievements from Tae-Yong Jung’s earlier literary criticism have influence on criticism these days and should not be overlooked with the importance of critical history.