earticle

논문검색

How Many Words Do You Need to Know to Understand TOEIC, TOEFL & EIKEN? An Examination of Text Coverage and High Frequency Vocabulary

원문정보

Kiyomi Chujo, Kathryn Oghigian

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

In order to understand the meaning of a written text, it is generally accepted that a reader should understand an average of nineteen out of twenty words, and this is referred to as “95% coverage.” Given the popularity and importance of proficiency tests in second language acquisition, this study explores how much vocabulary a learner needs to know in order to be able to read and understand TOEIC, TOEFL and EIKEN proficiency tests. The vocabulary from several retired tests was compared to the vocabulary on three criterion lists: a high-frequency word list from the British National Corpus, the Standard Vocabulary List, and Nation’s 14K word-family list. We were able to determine that in order to gain 95 percent coverage on TOEIC, a reader would need a minimum vocabulary size of 4,000 words, or 3,000 word families. TOEFL requires a 4,500-word vocabulary, or 3,500 word families, and a 5,500-word vocabulary, or 4,500 word families, is needed for EIKEN Pre-1st Grade. We also found that recent (2005/2006) versions of these tests require a smaller vocabulary compared to earlier versions. In addition, the SVL appears to provide a more accurate range of vocabulary for the lower level EIKEN tests but that a high correlation among results for the three criterion lists indicates these are stable and effective tools for determining text coverage vocabulary size.

목차

ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
  Understanding Text Coverage
  Aims of the Present Study
 METHOD
  Understanding Criterion Vocabulary Lists
  Proficiency Tests Examined
  Calculation of Vocabulary Level
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
  How Many Words are Needed to Cover 95% of the TOEIC Vocabulary?
  How Many Words are Needed to Cover 95% of the TOEFL Vocabulary?
  How Many Words are Needed to Cover 95% of the EIKEN Vocabulary?
  Is there any Difference in Vocabulary Level Between the Original Tests and the Recently Revised Versions?
  How do the Different Criterion Vocabulary Lists Affect the Vocabulary Level of the Tests?
 CONCLUSION
 THE AUTHORS
 REFERENCES
 APPENDIX

저자정보

  • Kiyomi Chujo Nihon University, Japan
  • Kathryn Oghigian Waseda University, Japan

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 6,700원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.