원문정보
中国涉外仲裁协议效力认定的机构及所适用的法律：实践困境与可能出路
피인용수 : 0건 (자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)
초록
중국어
内容摘要：涉外仲裁协议效力的认定一直是中国涉外民商事审判中的热点问题。它涉及两个方面，即认定涉外仲裁协议效力的管辖权及认定涉外仲裁协议效力所适用的法律。本文分析了现行法律框架下中国认定涉外仲裁协议效力的管辖机构及所适用的冲突规范。作者首先指出了中国涉外仲裁协议效力认定在管辖权和法律适用方面存在的问题，然后探讨了中国现行仲裁法律体制下有效仲裁协议的构成要件，分析了其缺陷。针对上述几个方面，作者认为，为使涉外仲裁在中国得到健康长远发展，应对可以受理涉外仲裁协议效力异议的法院的数量和权限进行限制，当仲裁地不在中国时，仲裁机构应优先受理涉外仲裁协议异议案件；涉外仲裁协议效力认定的冲突规范应与《纽约公约》一致，限制法院地法（中国法）的适用；中国法院在根据中国法律认定涉外仲裁协议效力时，应对中国《仲裁法》的规定采用自由解释而不应采用目前的限制性解释。当然，从长远来看，最好的方式是对《仲裁法》进行修订，完全采纳管辖权/管辖权原则，废除有关选定仲裁机构的强制性规定，最大限度地尊重当事人意思自治。
목차
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. The Authorities Competent to Determine the Validity of Arbitration Agreements in China
1. Where the Arbitration Commission Has the Final Say
2. Where the People’s Court Has the Final Say
3. Proposal
Ⅲ. The Law applicable to Determine the Validity of Arbitration Agreement in China
1. the Parties Chose the Law to Govern Their Arbitration Agreement
2. the Parties Did Not Choose the Law but Specified the Seat of Arbitration or the arbitral institution
3. the Parties Neither Chose the Law nor Specified the Seat of Arbitration and the arbitral institution
4. Proposal
Ⅳ. The Validity of the Arbitration Agreement under the Chinese Law : the Need for a Liberal Interpretation
Ⅴ. Conclusion
Bibliography
요약
Ⅱ. The Authorities Competent to Determine the Validity of Arbitration Agreements in China
1. Where the Arbitration Commission Has the Final Say
2. Where the People’s Court Has the Final Say
3. Proposal
Ⅲ. The Law applicable to Determine the Validity of Arbitration Agreement in China
1. the Parties Chose the Law to Govern Their Arbitration Agreement
2. the Parties Did Not Choose the Law but Specified the Seat of Arbitration or the arbitral institution
3. the Parties Neither Chose the Law nor Specified the Seat of Arbitration and the arbitral institution
4. Proposal
Ⅳ. The Validity of the Arbitration Agreement under the Chinese Law : the Need for a Liberal Interpretation
Ⅴ. Conclusion
Bibliography
요약
저자정보
참고문헌
자료제공 : 네이버학술정보