earticle

논문검색

한국의 BTO·BTL사업추진방식의 소유권귀속에 관한 개선방안

원문정보

Study on types in PPP in the Republic of Korea

황창용

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

PPPs can be classified by the legal nature of private-sector involvement in the Facility, using expressions such as BOT(build, operate and transfer), BTO(build, transfer and operate), BTL(build, transfer and Lease), DBFO(desig, build, finance and operate) and variants on these.
The Act on Private Participation in Infrastructure regulates mainly BTO type and BTL type(known in Korea as Operation PFI type). BTO type, under which ownership of the Facility is transferred to the Public Authority on the completion of construction and the Project Company is awarded the right to operate the facility for a certain period, is the prime example of a PPP. BTL type, where ownership of the Facility is transferred to the Public Authority on the completion of construction and the Project Company being awarded the right to operate the facility lease it to the Public Authority for a certain period, is Operation PFI type of a PPP.
This article reviewed the issues related to BTO type and BTL type in Korean legal system.
Firstly, this article researched whether or not the Public Authority has to take the responsibility of acquisition of the site. It is appropriate for site acquisition to be the responsibility of the Public Authority, because this involves acquiring larges areas of land in multiple ownership, unforeseen cost increase for site acquisition and there is any political controversy on the location of the Facility.
Secondly, the study reviewed whether it is appropriate for the Project Company to own the public Facility for the duration of the construction, and the ownership of the Facility can be transferred to the Public Authority on the completion of construction.
For those projects such as roads, tunnels, ports and rail network built on the public land, BTO type and BTL type are in conflict with the Law of Realty of Korea.
Finally, considering the issues related to BTO type and BTL type, the study examined DBFO type under which legal ownership of Facility remains with the Public Authority throughout the contract as the Alternative.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
 Ⅱ. 민간투자사업의 사업추진방식
  1. 민간투자사업
  2. 사업추진방식의 분류
  3. 우리나라 민간투자사업 사업추진방식
 Ⅲ. BTO·BTL사업추진방식의 소유권 귀속의 쟁점 및 개선방안
  1. 문제의 제기
  2. 누가 사업부지의 토지를 취득하는 것이 적정한가?
  3. 당해시설을 준공과 동시에 국가 또는 지방자치단체에 귀속시킬 수 있는가?
  4. 건설기간 중 실시협약이 해제되는 경우 당해시설의 소유권을 누구에게 귀속시킬 것인가?
  5. 개선방안
 Ⅳ. 맺은 말
 참고문헌
 

저자정보

  • 황창용 Hwang, Chang Yong. 원광대학교 법학전문대학원 부교수/변호사

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 5,500원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.