earticle

영어

A Study of Eschatological Concept in Ecclesiastes Young-Joon Park Lecturer at Seoul Theological University Heidelberg University Th.D. Ecclesiastes was not accepted as eschatological contents. but it was actual and opposite contents. because the author against the traditional revenge(ecclesiastes 7:15; 8:14) and emphasis the relationship between God and Human being(ecclesiastes 5:1) and there is no respectation to Human being(ecclesiastes 1:3; 2:11, 22; 3:19) and also coheret is focused on actual life not future one. so the study of ecclesiastes was in the opposite background of the text. but we can see the eschatological facts in additional context(ecclesiastes 3:17: 8:5b-6: 11:9; 12:14). The purpose of this paper is to find eschatological contents and intents of editor in ecclesiastes 3:17; 8:5b-6; 11:9; 12:14 focused on mishpat - Judgment. Finally to show the theological meaning of whole Ecclesiastes. For it, First of all. I'll recognize the late additional part of ecclesiastes through redaction criticism. and classify the part that has difference in Theology. this four contents was emphasised the notion about judgment. it reflect the respactation about eschatology. the one who add this contents maybe the teach man. The purpose of additional script is to emphasis Judgment of God. it will tell you only Hope of Human being. he solves the nervous and immorality in life as eschatological judgment. so he emphasis the judge of God. he finds the hope through God's judgment, that was not found in life. so the last main topic of ecclesiastes is not emptiness, but hope.

한국어

이 논문의 목적은 전도서에서의 종말론적 기대에 관한 내용과 편집자의 의도를 밝혀내고, 전도서의 신학적 의미를 새롭게 제시하는 것이다. 이 논문은 전도서 3장 17절, 8장 5b절-6절, 11장 9절, 그리고 12장 14절에 후기 유대 문학의 특징 중 하나인 심판의 개념이 강조됨으로써 종말론적인 기대감이 반영되어 있음을 주장한다. 이를 통해 필자는 전도서의 마지막 주된 주제는 허무가 아니라 희망임을 밝힌다.