earticle

논문검색

일본

미일행정협정과 ‘죽도’영유권과의 무관성 논증 - 일본의회속기록을 중심으로 -

원문정보

The Non-Relationship Demonstration of ‘United States-Japanese executive agreements’ and ‘Takeshima’ territory rights

최장근

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

Territory policy of United Nations SCAPIN No.677 at 1946 January was excluded that the Dokdo is not the Japanese territory (administrative and rule position). so Japan expected Japanese territory in the Peace Accord. Japanese government persuaded America as the Japanese territory. Japanese government was waited for the position of final decision in the Peace Accord but United Nations didn't decide that the Dokdo is Japanese territory in the Peace Accord. difference of the opinion between America and England is existence about the position of the Dokdo. After of all the Japanese expectation was not achieved it. Actually from 1946 January the Korea controls the Dokdo depending upon the SCAPIN No.677. Japanese government insisted the position of the Dokdo for the Japanese territory because of the Japan-U.S. Administrative Agreement. So the Japan- American executive agreement was discontinued. Japan asserted takeshima as Japanese territory until now. Because the evidence as Japanese territory is the Japan-American Executive Agreement. Japanese lawmaker pursued Japanese government legal Justice of characteristic of the Japan-U.S. Administrative Agreement. After of all the Japanese government recognized the fact that the assertion is contradiction.

목차

1. 들어가면서
 2. 일본의 ‘죽도’ 미 공군 훈련장 지정의 전말
 3. 미일행정협정의 ‘죽도’ 미 공군훈련장 지정과 일본의 의도
 4. 미 공군의 독도 훈련장 철회에 대한 한국의 한국영토론 주장의 부정
 5. 일본의 한국 요청에 의한 독도 훈련장 중단사실의 시인
 6. 일본의 미일행정협정과 ‘죽도’ 영유권과의 무관성 시인
 7. 맺으면서
 참고문헌
 논문초록

저자정보

  • 최장근 Choi, Jang-Keun. 대구대학교 일본어일본학과 교수

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.