earticle

영어

This study is purposed to contribute to the evaluation of each urban planning element by surveying specialists and professionals and to the proposal of appropriate urban management measures.For the analysis of this study, the author plotted a subjective variables and analysis model based on urban-compact-related references and reports, tested the analysis model through the first interview on professionals to prevent any efforts in the objectivity and calculation of the variables, and proposed qualitative urban-planning elements. The summary of the analysis results of the professionals' evaluation of the urban- planning elements is as follows. Firstly, in the upper standards of the Analytic Hierarchy Process Model, the weight of the property usage is over 44%. Therefore, it is approximately 1.6 times more important than transportation/telecommunication and 3.5 times than ecological environment/energy -saving or education and culture/welfare services. Secondly, the prioritized lists to consider the evaluation of urban-planning elements were accessibility of public transportation in transportation/telecommunication, minimization of commuting distance in property usage, population density and density of housing in property usage, and accessibility of green spaces in ecology environment/energy-saving.Thirdly, among the seven accessibility subcategories, four subcategories excluding the accessibility of public transportation and education facilities had weights below 0.023, and were evaluated insignificant.