earticle

논문검색

사회생태학과 심층생태학의 생태파시즘 논쟁과 그 교훈

원문정보

The Eco-Fascism Debate between Social Ecology and Deep Ecology and its Lesson

송명규

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어


There has been somewhat vehement dispute among so-called radical ecologies, especially between social ecology and deep ecology, on allegedly eco-fascist and misanthropic tendencies found in a number of writings and words of some deep ecological scholars and activists. For social ecologists, being led by Murray Bookchin, the founder of social ecology, deep ecology adheres to the same reactionary, antihumanistic, romantic, and irrational assumptions that presaged National Socialism and that are discernable in the work of Heidegger, the former Nazi. I think that social ecologists' attacks on deep ecology are largely unfair. But, it seems that we may get a very precious lesson from the dispute. Confronting the era of ecological crisis, we are apt to appeal to authoritarian measures to overcome it. To avoid such danger, we must do thoughtful self-examination and close listening to the criticism before jumping to hasty conclusions.

목차

Abstract:
 1. 서론
 2. 파시즘, 나치즘, 생태파시즘
 3. 생태파시즘 논쟁의 계기
 4. 논쟁의 쟁점
  4.1 신멜서스주의와 인간혐오주의
  4.2 낭만적 자연신비주의
  4.3 전일주의적 환경윤리관과 부족주의
  4.4 심층생태학의 선구자로서 하이데거
 5. 심층생태학은 진정 생태파시즘인가?
 6. 논쟁에 대한 성찰
 참고문헌

저자정보

  • 송명규 Song, Myung-gyu. 단국대학교 도시계획 및 부동산학부 교수

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 5,800원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.