earticle

논문검색

The Comparison of the Efficient Estimators: OLS, WLS, and Spatial Econometric Model

원문정보

Kyoun-Sup Chung

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

As far as the heteroscedasticity is concerned, it will cause the estimated variance of the coefficient to influence both direction, upward and downward. In other words, the estimated of variance of the coefficient can be overestimated or estimated depends on the nature of causing factors in the model. If we persist in using the usual testing procedures despite heteroscedasticity, whatever conclusions we draw or inferences we make be very misleading. As a result, we can no longer rely on the conventionally computed confidence intervals and the conventionally employed t and F tests. The most important conclusions of this paper in terms of methodological point of view can be summarized as follows: (i) Hedonic models of housing prices must be corrected for heteroscedasticity to ensure greater efficiency in the estimation of hedonic prices wherever the heteroscedasticity does exist, (ii) After careful detection of heteroscedasticity, the method of WLS(Weighted Least Squares) can provide more efficient estimate of the hedonic housing prices in the study area than the traditional OLS(Ordinary Least Squares), (iii) Spatial econometric model, such as SEM(Spatial Errors Model), can be more efficient estimator than the WLS method, and (iv) The spatial econometric model, SEM, is preferable as well as convenient to employ the application.

목차

Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. Data Description and Research Area
 III. The Problem of Heteroscedasticity
 IV. Detection of Heteroscedasticity and Spatial Autocorrelation
 V. The Comparison of the Models
 VI. Conclusions
 References

저자정보

  • Kyoun-Sup Chung 정건섭. Professor, Department of Public Administration, Pukyong National University

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.