earticle

논문검색

중앙·지방소청심사기관의 운영 및 심사결정에 관한 비교연구

원문정보

A Comparative Study on Management and Determination between Central and Local Appeals Commission

한봉기

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

Government officials's appeals are controlled by Central Appeals Commission and Local Government officials's appeals are controlled by Local Appeals Commissions which are installed in the Province or City. We can know the below three things after examining the results of both Appeals Commissions' determination from 2006 to 2010. First, there was a big deviation in the rate of relief. Second, there was also a big deviation in the determination about the type of similar illegal activities. Third, there is also a deviation in the rate of relief among 16 Local Appeals Commissions. This problem generates because controlling function in Province is insufficient. In other words, the tendency to be generous toward the Local Government officials can occur because disciplinary punishment and appeal affairs are controlled by the same Province. Like the illegal and unfair administrative measure is judged by the Administrative Appeals Commission as a higher-level office and an independent adjudicator, appeals judging as a kind of administrative judgement should also be carried out by higher-level office or an independent adjudicator. It is the best way to promote the objectivity and fairness of judgement. So I propose the jurisdiction problem between Central and Local Appeals Commission and the establishment of Appeals Judgement Law.

목차

Abstract
 Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
 Ⅱ. 이론적 논의 및 선행연구 검토
  1. 소청심사제도의 의의
  2. 행정심판과 연관성
  3. 선행연구 검토 및 분석 초점
 Ⅲ. 소청심사기관의 제도·운영현황과 심사결정 분석
  1. 중앙과 지방소청심사기관의 제도·운영현황
  2. 중앙·지방 소청심사기관의 심사결정 분석
 Ⅳ. 우리나라 소청심사기관의 발전적 과제
  1. 제도 및 운영상 과제
  2. 심사결정상 과제
 Ⅴ. 결론 및 정책적 제언
 참고문헌

저자정보

  • 한봉기 Bong-Kee Hahn. 소청심사위원회 상임위원

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.