earticle

논문검색

계약해제 규범의 비교법적 고찰 - PECL 및 DCFR의 규정체계를 중심으로 -

원문정보

A Study on Relative Legislation on the Regulations of Termination of Contracts - focused on the regulations of PECL and DCFR -

정진명

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

Termination of contracts, which is a means of the most important reliefs from non-performance, focuses on making the party afflicted with non-performance getting out of the restriction of a contractual relationship. Therefore, most of legislations have regulation about what requisites concede termination of contracts and what effects are given, which are regulated differently depending on the scope and characteristics of an individual legislation.
In the area of European contract law, the legislative assimilation for union and harmony in the European way has been proceeding. PECL published in 1998 is an outcome from the synthesis with European continental law and British and American common law divided traditionally. Especially, PECL limits the condition arising legislative right of termination to essential non-performance and carefully regulates termination of contracts as a result of non-performance. DCFR published in 2009 to solve the problem arisen from the difference of the regulations of contract law among the countries of EU. DCFR has been improving the unity of the regulation of EU contract law based on rationality and persuasion. Legal principles adopted from the united legislation of European contract law is the standard law being adoptable internationally and gives not a little meaning to Korean law which is under the revision of civil law.
So, this paper is to give some suggestions as to explanations and legislation controversies of Korean civil law through the consideration on the regulation systems on termination of contracts and on the relative legislation on the legislative requisites and effects in individual regulations.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
 Ⅱ. 유럽계약법원칙에 있어서 계약해제
  1. 서
  2. 해제의 요건
  3. 해제의 효과
  4. 우리 민법에의 시사점
 Ⅲ. 유럽사법원칙, 정의 및 모범규정
  1. 서
  2. 해제의 의의
  3. 해제요건
  4. 해제권 행사
  5. 해제의 효과
  6. 우리 민법에의 시사점
 Ⅳ. 맺음말
 참고문헌
 

저자정보

  • 정진명 Chung, Jin-Myung. 단국대학교 법과대학 교수.

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 7,500원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.