earticle

논문검색

현행 대리규정에 관한 입법론적 검토

원문정보

Legislative Reviews of Representative Statutes

이준형

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

From the comparative viewpoint, the Korean representative statutes(arts. 114-136 of the Civil Code) could be positioned in the rank of codifications deeply influenced by the German Civil Code(1900). However, those statutes are facing some moments of recodifiaction for some reasons: firstly, social changes resulted by bio-technological developments, inter alia for prolonging human life or re-production secondly, theoretical developments based on comparative legal studies thirdly, newly worked-out codes and instrumental devices such as PECL, UNIDROIT Principles and DCFR and lastly, influences of new institutions, e.g. class actions or adult guardianship, (in)directly concerned with representative schemes.
This article introduced some of the author's experiences as participant in the Civil Code reform committee under the auspice of the Ministry of Justice. The reader should keep in mind that the article reflects the limited discussions in the committee only until the October 2009 for some reasons including the author's private affairs.

목차

Ⅰ. 검토의 배경
  1. 比較法
  2. 現行法의 問題点
  3. 지금까지의 經過
 Ⅱ. 대리 규정의 構成에 관한 검토
  1. 대리 규정의 위치 문제
  2. 대리 규정의 체계 문제
  3. 이른바 表見代理의 규율
 Ⅲ. 대리 규정의 개별적 검토
  1. 의의(신설)
  2. 대리권의 범위(제118조[日民제103조] 개정)
  3. 대리인의 자격(신설) 및 능력(제117조[日民제102조] 개정)
  4. 대리인의 충실의무(제124조[日民제108조] 개정)
  5. 복대리(제120조 내지 제123조[日民제104조 내지 제107조] 개정)
  6. 대리행위의 효과(제114조, 제115조[日民제99조, 제100조]개정)
  7. 대리행위의 하자(제116조[日民제101조] 개정)
  8. 본인 또는 대리인이 수인인 경우(제119조[日民에는해당조문 없음] 개정)
  9. 대리권의 소멸과 관련한 문제(제127조 내지 제129조[日民제111조, 제112조])
  10. 무권대리와 추인(제130조 내지 제136조[日民제113조내지 제118조])
 참고문헌
 

저자정보

  • 이준형 Lee, Joon-Hyong. 한양대학교 법학전문대학원 교수.

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 6,600원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.