원문정보
초록
영어
According to the current law of national health insurance, the Minister of Health and Welfare can impose a suspension of business or license, and a fine with medical institutions who violate the law. In case that medical institutions raise an action for nullity with each penalty, they ask for replacing the suspension of business with a fine during the pendency of the action. But there is a long gap of time between an offense and administrative measures. One violation cause several types of administrative measures (suspension of business or fine, suspension of license etc.) and different government departments impose these penalties. It takes a lot of time to organize their opinions and they are liable to impose penalties after considerable space of time because of overwhelming tasks. Then the medical institutions can sustain a loss by getting unexpected administrative measures after their offense against the law. Thus, this article review whether extinctive prescription apply to the right of imposing fine on the law of national health insurance or not. Meanwhile, we have no regulations imposing a same fine to co-representatives of medical institution who infringe the law of national health insurance. On this point, this study review whether they have equal duty on that or not.
목차
II. 사실관계 및 판결내용
1. 사실관계
2. 사건의 쟁점(원고의 주장)
3. 판결내용
III. 과징금부과처분의 법적 성격 및 업무정지처분과의 관계
1. 과징금부과처분의 법적 성격
2. 업무정지처분과 과징금부과처분의 관계
IV. 과징금부과처분의 소멸시효 적용여부
1. 행정처분권한에 대한 소멸시효 적용여부
2. 변상금부과권, 부당이득금 징수권한에 대한 소멸시효 적용 판례
3. 과징금부과처분권한의 소멸시효 적용 여부 - 국가재정법 적용가능성
4. 실권의 법리 적용
5. 소결
V. 과징금부과처분의 연대납부의무 여부
1. 과징금부과처분의 대상
2. 과징금 연대납부의무
3. 법치행정의 원칙 배부 여부
4. 소결
VI. 결어
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
