earticle

논문검색

이원적 의료체계에서 의사와 한의사의 과실판단

원문정보

The Criteria of Medical Malpractice of Medical Doctors and Oriental Medical Doctors in Korea

이백휴

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

The Korea health care system has been divided into Western and Oriental (Korea traditional) medicine since 1951. In accordance with dualistic medical system, there are many conflict cases between medical doctors and oriental medical doctors. Meanwhile, there were much discussions about the meaning and criteria of medical malpractice(negligence). Especially, many cases have been built up about the criteria of medical malpractice through lawsuits. But, comparatively, there's few the medical malpractice case of the oriental medical doctors. According to a recent ruling of the Supreme Court, the legal principles of medical doctor's malpractice case are equally applied to the criteria of the oriental medical doctor's malpractice case. But there are much considerations in addition to these principles for the dualistic medical system and academic distinctiveness. This study is intended to review the dualistic medical system, the criterion of medical malpractice, and analysis this issues. To make long story short, under our dualistic medical system, judging the medical and oriental malpractice should be considered relatively. However, it makes sense that we want medical doctor or oriental medical doctor to demand the reinforced negligence to restrict the unnecessary discretion. If there is lack of evidence-based medicine or the rationality suspected, the health care providers must give enough proof.

목차

I. 들어가는 말
 II. 이원적 의료체계와 의료과실 판단 기준
  1. 의료행위와 한방의료행위 구분
  2. 의료과실의 판단기준
  3. 의료과실 판단의 실제
 III. 상대 직역 의료지식 인지의무 부과의 타당성
  1. 서언
  2. 주요 판례의 내용
  3. 상대 직역의 의료지식 인지 여부
 IV. 의료주체의 재량권의 한계
  1. 서언
  2. 재량에 상응한 의무 부과
  3. 의무부과 사례
  4. 소결
 V. 맺음말
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

저자정보

  • 이백휴 Lee, Baek Hyu. 의료정책연구소 책임연구원, 법학박사

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 7,900원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.