원문정보
The Correlational Study of Health Promotion Lifestyle and Body Composition in a University Students
초록
영어
Purporse : The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between a health promoting lifestyle and body composition in university students. The study subjects were 194 university students who attended K-university located in Chungnam. Methods : The data was collected between March 2 and May 31, 2004. The instrument used for this study was the modified Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile(HPLP) developed by Walker, Sechrist, & Pender(1987). The body composition was measured by In Body 3.0, a Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer. The data was analyzed using the SPSS/WIN 10.0 program by t-test, ANOVA and pearson correlation coefficients. Results : The results of this study are as follows: 1) The scores of the Health Promoting Lifestyle(HPL) ranged from 79 to 170, with a mean score of 110(±15.8). The mean scores of sub-categorical HPL were self-actualization 31.8(±4.9), health responsibility 17.0(±4.0), exercise 8.3(±3.2), nutrition 15.4(±3.7), interpersonal relationships 20.3(±3.5) and stress management 17.2(±3.4). 2) The HPL according to the subjects' general characteristics had significant correlation to exercise amount(F=8.09, p<.01), drinking amount(F=6.56, p<.01), perceived health status(F=19.2, p<.01) and perceived health knowledge (F=15.9, p<.01). 3) The total HPL did not significantly correlate with any categories in body composition. The exercise area of sub-categorical HPL had significant positive correlation to height (r=.199, p<.01), weight(r=.181, p<.05) and soft lean mass(r=.257, p<.01), and negative correlation to percent body fat(r=-.255, p<.01) in body composition. Conclusion : The results suggest that the exercise area of sub-categorical HPL was an important variable for an exercise program's development such as nursing intervention for the health promotion of university students.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
1. 연구의 필요성
2. 연구 목적
3. 용어의 정의
Ⅱ. 연구 방법
1. 연구 설계
2. 연구 대상 및 자료수집방법
3. 연구 도구
4. 자료 분석 방법
Ⅲ. 연구결과 및 고찰
1. 연구대상자의 특성
2. 건강증진 생활양식 수행정도
3. 대상자 특성에 따른 건강증진 생활양식 수행정도
4. 대상자 특성에 따른 신체조성 정도
5. 전체 및 영역별 건강증진 생활양식 수행정도와 신체조성간의 상관관계
VI. 결론 및 제언
Reference
