earticle

논문검색

근대 사회과학의 아포리아 : 사회과학의 ‘인간’ 개념을 중심으로

원문정보

Aporia of the Modern Social Science: The Concept of MAN/man

Kyunghwan Oh

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

Modernity, in Kant’s and Foucault’s understanding, takes the doublet of a man as a central feature. Stemming from Humean skepticism and the ensuing epistemological crisis, Kant posited the Man in a perpetual oscillation between transcendence and empirical ‘reality.’ The history of social science from Comte and Marx to Weber and Durkheim is continuous reformulation of Kant’s epistemology. Comte and Marx tried to evade the epistemological problem of doublet by recasting human phenomena through specific nomos: Comte by projecting onto them transcendental humanity that is transhistorically applicable; and Marx by reducing them to empirical reality organized by specific nomos. Though Both succeeded to a certain extent in creating viable and practicable social science, they created a whole new problem of normative science. Rejecting such nomology, Weber and Durkheim tried to base social science on a different epistemological percepts by recasting the object of social science. Durkheim re-imagined human beings in proto-structuralist postulation, hitting a delicate balance. Weber, on the other hand, returned to the idea of civilization, while taking great cautions not to project evolutionary bias. Still, both of them could not completely escape Eurocentric underpinnings, because their recasting of men still followed the basic presupposition of modernity, which is in turn product of the European historical experiences.

목차

I. 들어가는 말
 II. 확실성의 추구 : 꽁트와 마르크스의 법칙적 사회과학
 III. 인간의 파편화 : 베버와 뒤르깽의 사회과학
 IV.
 Abstract

저자정보

  • Kyunghwan Oh Sungshin Women’s University

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 5,800원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.