earticle

영어

Reviewing the subject related with amending the proviso of Article 22 Section 3-1 of the Internal Organs, etc. Transplant Act, as a factor of Internal Organs Extract, Article 22 Section 3 prescribes that the intention should be priority when he(she) expressed his(her) intention to internal organs extract, and the intention of the bereaved families should be considered as a secondary importance. In case he(she) had defined the disposal method of his(her) corporeality before he(she) died, it should be generally accepted that the disposer has a little binding force unless the method would not be against good customs and social order. Basically, the character of the existing act, Article 2 Section 2 of the Internal Organs, etc. Transplant Act, should not be understood simply as a declaratory statement. It should be understood that the intention to disposal of his(her) corporeality and ashes comes out as the right of self-determination when he(she) is alive, and as the personal right of the deceased when he(she) is dead. Moreover, the personal rights of the deceased, the transformed type of the rights of self-determination, are always primary and preferential prior to the intentions of the bereaved families to the corporeality of the deceased. Accordingly, I suppose, the existing act, the proviso of Article 22 Section 3-1 of the Internal Organs, etc. Transplant Act should be rescinded.