초록
영어
In the so-called inalienable possession (IAP) constructions both the possessor NP (PS NP) and the body-part NP (BP NP) can take Accusative Case. In their passive counterparts the BP NP can take either Nominative or Accusative Case, whereas the PS NP can take only Nominative Case. I suggest how to account for these Case marking phenomena in terms of Agree in the framework of Chomsky's (2000, 20001) recent Minimalist Approach. I argue that the Case marking phenomena can be straightforwardly accounted for in terms of the theory of Agree and the basic syntactic relation and principle such as c-command and MLC without the stipulations employed in the previous accounts.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Case Marking in Korean IAP Constructions
3. Previous Analyses of the Structure of the IAP Construction
3.1 Possessor Raising Approaches
3.2 The Base-Generation Approach
4. J.-S. Lee's (1992) Account
5. An Alternative Account
5.1 The Theoretical Background
5.2 A Minimalist Account
6. Conclusion
References
3. Previous Analyses of the Structure of the IAP Construction
3.1 Possessor Raising Approaches
3.2 The Base-Generation Approach
4. J.-S. Lee's (1992) Account
5. An Alternative Account
5.1 The Theoretical Background
5.2 A Minimalist Account
6. Conclusion
References
키워드
저자정보
참고문헌
자료제공 : 네이버학술정보