원문정보
초록
영어
An award for a contract with the government cannot be decided based only on the lowest price. Government is using a Qualification System (QS) to select the best supplier. However, the weight of evaluation that is used in the QS was assigned without an expert's opinion. The purpose of this paper is to approach the alternative method that aims to weigh evaluation elements. For this purpose, this paper adopts AHP methodology that is being used widely in decision making. So far, a number of papers have reported that AHP is appropriate in making multi-criteria decisions by deriving ratio scales from paired comparisons. Some interesting results were found from this approach. One of the elements, such as contract performance in value, was seven times higher than the current value. To explain the differences between the current weight and the weight determined in this study, this paper uses real data that was evaluated in 2010.This study proposes that QS has to adopt a systematic method like AHP to support its goals In addition, this study is recommending a more efficient process considering the results.
목차
1. 서론
2. 물품 적격심사의 현상 진단 및 문제점 분석
3. AHP 기법을 적용한 가중치 산정
4. AHP 결과 분석 및 적용
5. 결론
참고문헌