earticle

논문검색

An optimal Mesh Algorithm for Remote Protein Homology Detection

초록

영어

Remote protein homology detection is a problem of detecting evolutionary relationship between proteins at low sequence similarity level. Among several problems in remote protein homology detection include the questions of determining which combination of multiple alignment and classification techniques is the best as well as the misalignment of protein sequences during the alignment process. Therefore, this paper deals with remote protein homology detection via assessing the impact of using structural information on protein multiple alignments over sequence information. This paper further presents the best combinations of multiple alignment and classification programs to be chosen. This paper also improves the quality of the multiple alignments via integration of a refinement algorithm. The framework of this paper began with datasets preparation on datasets from SCOP version 1.73, followed by multiple alignments of the protein sequences using CLUSTALW, MAFFT, ProbCons and T-Coffee for sequence-based multiple alignments and 3DCoffee, MAMMOTH-mult, MUSTANG and PROMALS3D for structural-based multiple alignments. Next, a refinement algorithm was applied on the protein sequences to reduce misalignments. Lastly, the aligned protein sequences were classified using the pHMMs generative classifier such as HMMER and SAM and also SVMs discriminative classifier such as SVM-Fold and SVM-Struct. The performances of assessed programs were evaluated using ROC, Precision and Recall tests. The result from this paper shows that the combination of refined SVM-Struct and PROMALS3D performs the best against other programs, which suggests that this combination is the best for RPHD. This paper also shows that the use of the refinement algorithm increases the performance of the multiple alignments programs by at least 4%.

목차

Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Framework for Finding the Optimal Mesh Algorithm
  2.1. Dataset Generation
  2.2. Multiple Alignments
  2.3. Refinement Algorithm
  2.4. Classification Algorithm
  2.5. Performance Evaluation
 3. Results
  3.1. HMMER Performance
  3.2. SAM Performance
  3.3. HMMER and SAM Performance
  3.4. SVM-Fold Performance
  3.5. SVM-Struct Performance
  3.6. SVM-Fold and SVM-Struct Performance
  3.7. PHMMs and SVMs Performance
 4. Discussion
  4.1. PROMALS3D: The Best Multiple Alignments
  4.2. SVM-Struct: The Best Classification Algorithm
  4.3. REFINER: The Impact or Refinement Algorithm
  4.4. PRS: The Optimal Mesh Algorithm
 5. Conclusions
 References

저자정보

  • Firdaus M Abdullah Laboratory of Computational Intelligence and Biotechnology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Razib M. Othman Laboratory of Computational Intelligence and Biotechnology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Shahreen Kasim Department of Web Technology, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
  • Rathiah Hashim Department of Web Technology, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
  • Rohayanti Hassan Laboratory of Computational Intelligence and Biotechnology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Hishammuddin Asmuni Laboratory of Computational Intelligence and Biotechnology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Jumail Taliba Laboratory of Computational Intelligence and Biotechnology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.