earticle

논문검색

2000년대 역사소설에 나타난 비역사성의 양상 ─ 김훈, 신경숙, 김영하를 중심으로

원문정보

The aspect of nonhistorical nature in 2000s historical novels

서덕순

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

As to a change of historical novels in 2000s, a new name of‘New age historical novel’has been devised. New age historical novel is clearly distinguished from the two trends showed by existing historical novels, that is, 1) a novel showing the interest of history itself, what is called, a kind of historical talks and 2) a novel creating stories metaphorically or allegorically, with a writer own idea or prospect of history reversely projected. Because New age historical novel demonstrates that history is exclusively used as an aesthetic thing not from a dimension not of an idea or interest but from a dimension of the personality and imagination of mutually different style. By the way, the historical novel as what is called New age historical novel is expanding an access to history with different character and taste, so to speak, a type as a novel pursuing for aestheticization rather than is achieving qualitative increase as effective alternatives or supplement of existing historical novels, so that it seems to be more feasible to be classified into an existing historical novel or a subordinate genre of a novel. This paper is intended to consider three aspects of non- historical nature indicated in 2000s historical novels, centering around 『Namhansanseong』(2007) written by Kim Hun, 『Rijin』(2007) written by Sin Gyeong-suk, and 『Black Flower』(2003) written by Kim Young- ha, by condensing the different nature and tastes of 2000s historical novels in the concept of non- historical nature.

목차

1. 문제 제기─최근 역사소설의 변화에 대하여
 2. 역사성이 제거된 역사의 무대─김훈, 『남한산성』
 3. 보편성이 아닌 특수성의 역사 이야기─신경숙, 『리진』
 4. 기존의 역사소설과 역사 해석에 대한 근본적인 해체─김영하, 『검은 꽃』
 5. 결론
 참고문헌
 Abstract

저자정보

  • 서덕순 Seo, Duk-soon. 경희대 겸임교수

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.