원문정보
The aspect of nonhistorical nature in 2000s historical novels
초록
영어
As to a change of historical novels in 2000s, a new name of‘New age historical novel’has been devised. New age historical novel is clearly distinguished from the two trends showed by existing historical novels, that is, 1) a novel showing the interest of history itself, what is called, a kind of historical talks and 2) a novel creating stories metaphorically or allegorically, with a writer own idea or prospect of history reversely projected. Because New age historical novel demonstrates that history is exclusively used as an aesthetic thing not from a dimension not of an idea or interest but from a dimension of the personality and imagination of mutually different style. By the way, the historical novel as what is called New age historical novel is expanding an access to history with different character and taste, so to speak, a type as a novel pursuing for aestheticization rather than is achieving qualitative increase as effective alternatives or supplement of existing historical novels, so that it seems to be more feasible to be classified into an existing historical novel or a subordinate genre of a novel. This paper is intended to consider three aspects of non- historical nature indicated in 2000s historical novels, centering around 『Namhansanseong』(2007) written by Kim Hun, 『Rijin』(2007) written by Sin Gyeong-suk, and 『Black Flower』(2003) written by Kim Young- ha, by condensing the different nature and tastes of 2000s historical novels in the concept of non- historical nature.
목차
2. 역사성이 제거된 역사의 무대─김훈, 『남한산성』
3. 보편성이 아닌 특수성의 역사 이야기─신경숙, 『리진』
4. 기존의 역사소설과 역사 해석에 대한 근본적인 해체─김영하, 『검은 꽃』
5. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract