earticle

논문검색

Notes on Apparent DP Ellipsis: A Reply to Lee & Kim (2010)

원문정보

Hee-Don Ahn, Sungeun Cho

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

Ahn, Hee-Don & Cho, Sungeun. 2011. Notes on Apparent DP Ellipsis: A Reply to Lee & Kim (2010). Korean Journal of Linguistics, 36-2, 457-471. Ahn & Cho (2009, 2010) suggest that ellipsis is licensed by functional heads such as C, T, and D which can bear an [E] feature. In the same reasoning, they suggest that a lexical category like V or semi-lexical category v which gives a theta role cannot have an [E] feature. Under the analysis, it is predicted that when DP is directly selected by the lexical category V, which cannot bear an [E] feature, DP ellipsis isn't allowed. However, there is an example which apparently shows that DP ellipsis seems to be allowed. Ahn & Cho (2009, 2010) argue that the missing constituent is in fact a pro, but not derived from DP ellipsis which is theoretically impossible. Recently, Lee & Kim (2010) claim that Korean has both pro and DP ellipsis. This paper aims to explore the examples that seem to be DP ellipsis and argue that it indeed involves pro. (Konkuk University & Yeungnam University)

목차

Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Ahn & Cho (2009, 2010)
 3. The Interpretation of Pro: A Reply to Lee & Kim (2010)
 4. Concluding Remarks
 References

저자정보

  • Hee-Don Ahn Konkuk University
  • Sungeun Cho Yeungnam University

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.