earticle

논문검색

제3부 : 일반연구논문

배아연구와 불법행위책임

원문정보

Human Embryo Research and Tort Liability

서종희

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

Recently, many nations said “yes” to human embryonic stem cell research, signing an executive order to permit funding for the research in the mame of achieving health and life of humankind. Human Embryo Research is permitted by our Bioethics & Biosafety Act. But, illegal research cannot be divorced from civil liability since it requires the destruction of eggs of fertilized eggs and personal rights of embryo-creator. After all, though we allow to do research embryo, we should control the capacity of abuse of embryo research for embryo-creator. If research violate the law(Bioethics & Biosafety Act or Civil Law, etc), it comes to a delict by pecuniary loss and non-pecuniary loss. When it comes to pecuniary loss, Human Embryo is not body but special property. Supreme Court maintained a stance that mental suffering is generally deemed as compensable for damages for the loss of property where a person's property right is invaded by a tort or non-performance of obligation. Thus, where mental suffering occurs, which cannot be compensated by recovery of property losses, the situation must be a special circumstance and the injured could claim consolation money for such losses only if the offender knew or would have known of such special circumstances(Supreme Court Decision 96Da31574 delivered on Nov, 26, 1996, etc.). That is to say, Supreme Court regards mental suffering through person's property right invaded by a tort as damages that have arisen through special circumstances. According to Civil law article 393 (2), the injured could claim consolation money for such losses only if only if the offender had foreseen or could have foreseen such circumstances. Also our court will solve through damages for non-pecuniary loss by complementary function of consolation money in that pecuniary loss could be difficult to valuate.

목차

I. 들어가는 말
 II. 위법성 인정 여부: 배아연구의 한계
  1. 실정법상 한계
  2. 사회질서상 한계
  3. 비교법적 검토
 III. 침해법익
  1. 배아 자체에 대한 침해
  2. 배아생성자의 법익침해
 IV. 배상되는 손해의 종류 및 손해배상의 범위
  1. 재산적 손해
  2. 정신적 손해
 V. 맺는 말
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

저자정보

  • 서종희 Seo, Jong-Hee. 연세대학교 법과대학 박사수료(민법 전공)//연세대학교 법학연구소 연구위원

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 6,900원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.