earticle

논문검색

토지 점유에 따른 장래의 부당이득반환청구의 訴의 訴益 - 관련 판례를 중심으로 -

원문정보

The interest of lawsuit of the future action of injustice profits return in land occupation - focused on the related judicial precedent -

김학기

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

As the court strictly decides the legitimacy of the expiration of future action in a suit of return claim against future injustice profits caused by land occupation, as the plaintiff argues, the court does not properly protect the creditor's right because it forces the creditor to sue multiple times within a time limit for the return claim and it results in increasing the expense of suit and getting the procedures complicated. Therefore, it is necessary to allow flexibility in deciding the future lawsuit qualification.
The court should not turn down the lawsuit by denying the lawsuit qualification for plaintiff due to the improper expiration period. The court rather should flexibly decide by executing the right of explanation to balance the gains of the plaintiff and the burden on the defendant by considering the cost of claim, the condition and the title of road occupation, and the law related knowledge of the parties with a view to the blance of interest of related parties.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
  1. 장래이행의 소의 意義와 訴의 利益
 Ⅱ. 청구적격(권리보호자격)
  1. 서
  2. 청구적격과 ‘미리 청구할 필요’
  3. 장래 발생할 청구권(장래 부당이득반환청구권)의 청구적격
 Ⅲ. 미리 청구할 필요
  1. 의의
  2. 계속적·반복적 채무의 현재 이행기 도래분에 대해 불이행한 경우 장래 도래분에 대한 청구의 경우
  3. 임차물인도의 제소전화해의 미리 청구할 필요여부
 Ⅳ. 결론
  1. 장래 이행의 終期설정의 엄격성 완화
  2. 석명권행사
 참고문헌
 〈ABSTRACT〉

저자정보

  • 김학기 Kim, Hak-Ki. 전북대학교 법학전문대학원 교수, 변호사,

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.