earticle

영어

In this research is clarified the contents of a tactics military art in the cultural structure of Korean, China and Japan after the 16th century. It is through a document analysis and comparison of whole one approach method of a study of sports anthropology. I think the movement technology of ≪Heiho-hidensho≫,≪Bujutsu-hayamanabi≫ and≪Muye-dobo-tongji≫ will be compared and examined focusing on 'Nian-zhou-shi' for this research ≪Jixiao-xinshu≫ 'The Art of Fist', and considers military art culture common in Korea, China and Japan through such contents. ≪
Jixiao-xinshu≫, it was possible to compare ≪Heiho-hidensho≫,≪Bujutsu-hayamanabi≫ and ≪Muye-dobo-tongji≫, and copies of military art of Korea, China and Japan through consideration focusing on `Nian-zhou-shi''. ≪Jixiao-xinshu≫ at China in spite of a Chinese book on tactics, and it was also exerted on Korea and Japan. It's possible to confirm ≪Muye-dobo-tongji≫ by which compilation was issued at Korea and Japan. ≪Heiho-hidensho≫ and≪Bujutsu-hayamanabi≫, the contents common to ≪Jixiao-xinshu≫ and the typical example is `Nian-zhou-shi' of the movement the 'The Art of Fist' of Representatives is. After movement technology was compared and examined 3 books of `Description' and 'Explanation' focusing on `Nian-zhou-shi' of ≪Jixiao-xinshu≫. The `Description' of movement was similar, but a movement name was different from the `Explanation'. Such 4 books were doing the movement explanation separately to the same movement. But it was possible to see the part of the military art culture in at that time through a common point of a described setting example movement of `Nian-zhou-shi''.