earticle

영어

KINESIOLOGY, 2011, 13(1): 13-20. Relation between Physical Education and Movement Education. [INTRODUCTION] The purpose of this study is to review the relationship between physical education and movement education and to investigate both relations should be transformed into any relationship. In order to clarify the relationship between physical education and movement education. [METHOD] I was set to two kinds of research questions. One is the relationship between physical education and movement education. the other is how the relationship between physical education and movement education should change in the future. The former is the past and the present status and The letter is the way of the future response.
[RESULT] Discussing on the relationship between physical education and movement education may be presented to the three. It may be presented as follow. (1) physical education = kinesiology education. (2) physical education > exercise education. (3) physical education < movement education. In center of discussion, there is relation between realism and usability
in present. The position of the presenter chose (3) physical education < movement education. Beyond the limits of existing physical education, and movement education as an alternative concept including physical education is reasonable. However, when the previous movement education has already caught on a concept of physical education as a model and not consistent with the current situation of the times, there are points of criticism is expected. Movement education meets the needs of the present day and expanding its role and attempt to change the rela tionship is needed. If it is impossible to switch physical education into movement education. We try to change a small portion. In order to drive that change substantially in the direction may be present in two. One is a change of name of the textbook of high school physical education.
The other is a change in the nature of the textbook of physical education. To try change of name and textbook character of physical education in the high school is to promote the gradual expansion. We can do this as an alternative. How far in the last days of physical education was the appropriate course content. The current era of rapidly changing to meet the dimensional changes in the name of the textbook and to change the content of the textbook teaching physical education to explore the era of progressive change is to follow. [CONCLUSION] In discussing the relationship between physical education and movement education, My position is physical education more specifically and to reduce the area as a movement education. This is the original place of Physical Education survival strategies.

한국어

운동학 학술지, 2011, 13(1): 13-20. 체육과 운동교육의 관계. [서론] 이 연구의 목적은 체육과 운동교육의 관계에 대하여 알아보는데 있다. [방법] 이를 위하여 체육과 운동교육과 관련된 선행연구의 검토와 문헌연구를 시도하였다. [결과] 체육과 운동교육의 관계는 세 가지 관점에서 논의하였다. 첫째, 체육=운동교육(kinesiology education)이다. 둘째, 체육>운동교육(exercise education)이다. 셋째, 체육<운동교육(movement education)이다. 논의의 핵심은 운동학의 입장에서 어떤 관계가 가장 현실적이고 유용한 관계라는 점이다. 현재 대한운동학회와 대한운동사협회가 채택할 수 있는 운동과 체육교육의 관계는 어떤 관계인가를 숙고해봐야 한다. 연구자의 입장에서는 아마도 세 번째 관계를 선택할 수밖에 없다고 생각한다. 기존의 체육의 한계를 넘어서는 대체개념과 운동교육에 대한 성격을 나타낼 수 있는 용어는 체육을 포함하는 운동교육이 적당하다. 급변하는 시대의 부응하고 학생들의 의식을 반영하여 체육의 성격변화에 대한 모색이 필요하다는 것을 인식할 수 있다. [결론] 결과적으로 체육에서 운동교육으로 급진적 변화가 어렵기 때문에 점진적 변화를 시도할 필요가 있다. 이를 위하여 고등학교 체육교과서의 명칭과 내용이 체육에서 운동교육으로의 점진적인 변화를 모색하는 것이 시대를 따르는 수순이라고 본다.