earticle

논문검색

제1부 기획논문

야담의 전개와 경화세족

원문정보

Yadam(野談) and Kyounghwasejok(京華世族)

이강옥

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

In this article, I tried to explain the relation between Yadam and Kyounghwasejok(京華世族). There are many Yadam anthology editors who belong to Kyounghwasejok. Imbang(任埅), Immae(任邁), Lee Hyipeong(李羲平), Lee Wyonmoung(李源命), Lee Hyonki(李玄綺) belong to Kyounghwasejok. No Myongheom(盧命欽) and Seo Yuyeong(徐有英) don't belong to Kyounghwasejok, but they are closely related to the people of Kyounghwasejok Imbang, Immae, Lee Hyipeong, Lee Wyonmoung represented the cultural experience of their own group in the boundary of their own class. By comparison, Lee Hyonki showed a very critical perspective toward the world view of Kyounghwasejok in their own ordinary life boundary. No Myongheom was faithful in portraying the mood of the storytelling space of Hong Bonghan's family. Seo Yuyeong was eager to represent the inclination of the members of Hong Sanhan's family who had strong aspiration towards literature. Yadam as the representative literary genre of Late Chosun Dynasty was based on the experience of people in Late Chosun society. But Yadam anthologies whose editors had intimate relationship with Kyounghwasejok moved to the opposite direction of reality where benevolence and destiny had crucial power. This change was caused by the world view of Kyounhwasejok. On the contrary, An Seokgeong who edited Sapgyomanrok and Lee Donyun who edited Paksochonwha din't belong to Kyounghwasejok. They empathized the hegemonical ideology. Specially, they discriminated the peoples who participated in the political rebellion. Yadam as a narrative genre began to accept the importance of human desire and acknowledge the necessity of fulfilling the desire. However, in the process of recording by the editors of Kyounghwasejok, Yadam's contents and form were transformed. Destiny and benevolence became overestimated. As Kyounghwasejok participated in the recording and editing Yadam, these kinds of change appeared. As a result, the conflict between desire and destiny, human being and superior being, secular and unworldliness emerged as a significant part in Yadam anthology.

목차

1. 머리말
 2 야담집 편저자와 경화세족
 3. 이념의 공유와 형식 과잉
 4. 패트런 경화세족의 積德예찬
 5. 운명론의 강화
 6 경화세속의 俗氣배제와 19세기 야담
 7. 경화세족의 독서경험에 의한 야담집의 양산과 서사의 해체
 8. 마무리
 참고문헌
 Abstract

저자정보

  • 이강옥 Lee, Kangok. 영남대학교

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.