earticle

영어

The purpose of this study was to examine closely on golfers athletic ability by using of NLP skills for six weeks. The object of this study wirelessly allocated, at our option, sixteen applicants for professional golfer and controlled group by ten people to each group. Theme song skill, Cinema skill, Photo frame skill, anchoring skill, circle of excellence skill, eye accessing cues of NLP technique was used. We overhauled 10 people of each experimental group and controlled group on Putting (5m, 10m) and Bunker shot(10m) and the survey was conducted by using of CSAI-2, SIQ. From the collected data we produced by using of statistical program called SPSS/PC+ 10.1 Version a Competition state instability of experimental group and controlled group, mean and standard deviation of components of sports mind status and scores of golf achieving ability, and used repeated measure of analysis ANOVA to verify reciprocal action among groups and the period respectively. Major conclusions of this study are as below.
First of all, on the basis of periods, there was statistically similar difference regarding components of intellectual instability. However, there was no statistical similar difference on the basis of between groups, interactivity between groups and period. There was no statistical similar difference regarding components of physical status instability when judging based on interactivity between groups, period, and group and period.
Second, there were statistically similar differences between groups, periods, groups and periods regarding the visual mental picture factor. Regarding an acoustic image factor, there was no statistically similar difference between groups and periods interactivity but between groups and periods. Regarding sensibility mental factor, there was no statistically similar difference between groups, however there was statistically similar difference between periods, interactivity between groups and periods. Regarding atmosphere mental factor, there were all statistically similar differences between groups, periods, interactivity between groups and periods.
Third, there was statistically similar difference between groups regarding 5m Putting factors. However there was no statistically similar difference on interactivity between periods, groups and periods. Regarding 10m Putting factors, there was statistically similar difference between groups. However there were no statistically similar differences between periods, interactivity between groups and periods. Regarding Bunker factors, there were statistically similar differences between groups, periods respectively, however there was no statistically no similar interactivity between groups and periods.