earticle

논문검색

연구논문

헌법재판에서의 헌법 또는 법률의 해석․적용

원문정보

Construction of Constitution or Act and It's Application in Constitutional Adjudication

박찬주

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

The writer emphasize in this essay the fundamental attitude for constructing the Constitution and the laws.
First, the Constitutional Court should ascertain whether the interpretation of the laws required to apply to the proceeding cases has already exist and, if exist, the Constitutional Court should follow the interpretation by the Supreme court unless such interpretation contravenes the Constitution.
Second, as the ultimate power of constructing the Constitution belongs to the Constitutional Court, the Court should take affirmative attitude to correct the Supreme Court's disobeying attitude by rejecting the Constitutional Court's construction. The main sentence of the Article 68(1) provides "Any person who is infringed his fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution due to exercise or non-excercise of the public, excluding judgment of the court, may request the Constitutional Court an adjudication on constitutional complaint." For this reason the Constitutional Court grants the constitutional complaint on judgment of the courts only when the adjudicating courts apply the laws already declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court.98)
The writer asserts to extend the granting the constitutional complaints on judgment of the court. The necessary areas are as such where ① the Supreme Court apply arbitrarily by enlarging the ruling of the Constitutional Court, ② the Supreme Court evades the binding force of the Constitutional Court's decision of unconformity to Constitution, ③ the Supreme Court construct the unconstitutionality of the law directly without requesting an 98) Constitutional Court, decision of 96hunma172․173, declared in Dec. 24, 1997. adjudicate of unconstitutionality to the Constitutional Court by the Article 41(1) of the Constitutional Court Act.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
 Ⅱ. 법률의 해석
  1. 헌법재판소의 자유로운 법률해석권 논쟁
  2. 법률 또는 법률조항의 의미확정에 있어서 주의할 점
 Ⅲ. 헌법의 해석
  1. 헌법 자체에 대한 해석
  2. 헌법합치적 헌법해석
 Ⅳ. 법원의 헌법해석과 이에 대한 통제
  1. 법원의 합헌판단권
  2. 법원의 헌법합치적 법률해석
  3. 재판소원
 Ⅴ. 맺음말
 참고문헌
 

저자정보

  • 박찬주 Park, Chan-Ju. 조선대학교 법과대학 교수, 변호사.

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.