원문정보
A Comparative Study on Japanese Cancellation Trial System of Trademark Registration Based on Non-Use and Its Characteristics
초록
영어
Under Article 50 of the Japanese Trademark Act, where a request for cancellation of trademark registration based on non-use is filed by a third party, the registration of such trademark may be cancelled for the reason of non-use unless the holder of the trademark right proves the following: (i) Within three years prior to the registration of the request for cancellation,
(ii) in Japan, (iii) any of the holder of a trademark right, exclusive licensee or non-exclusive licensee, (iv) in connection with any of the designated goods pertaining to the request, (v) has used the registered trademark.
Under the consciousness for the regulations as described above, it is intended in this article to find the direction we should move toward by comparing and analyzing the circumstances regarding issues(for example, formal use, requirements for request, a person requesting a trial, the effectiveness of a final trial decision, etc.) on a system for cancellation based on non-use in the Japanese Trademark Act and its characteristics, and further studying Japanese legislation purposes for seeking for standardization of the criteria about applying regulations of cancellation based on non-use of registered trademark simultaneously.
목차
Ⅱ. 청구요건면에서의 특징
1. 등록상표의 불사용기간의 판단문제
2. 국내에서의 불사용의 인정문제
3. 심판청구직전의 급한 사용 및 형식적 사용의 배제문제
4. 등록상표에 관한 사용인정문제
5. 지정상품면에서의 사용인정문제
6. 등록상표의 사용주체의 판단문제
7. 불사용에 관한 정당한 이유의 판단문제
Ⅲ. 심판청구인에 관한 특징
Ⅳ. 심결확정의 효과면에서의 특징
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
