원문정보
초록
영어
This thesis introduces the trends of korean courts' ruling on damages in medical malpractice cases for past 10 years. First of all, Korean courts' ruling have had a tendency to pay only non-economic damages for not taking the informed consent. If a doctor cannot get the informed consent from a patient, he compensate only non-economic damages for the infringement of self-determination rights of patient. It's enough for the plaintiff to prove the infringement of self-determination rights, if the plaintiff just want to get non-economic damages. The Korean Supreme court have ruled that if plaintiffs want to get economic damages for the infringement of self-determination rights or informed consent, plaintiffs must prove that the infringement of self-determination rights is the proximate cause of the economic damages of patient. There is another tendency for the Korean Supreme court to limit the damages in medical malpractice cases on the ground of patient's diseases' dangerousness or patient's idiosyncrasy. In the past courts often limit the damages only to 70~80% of total damages, but now a days courts mostly limit the damages to 20~30%. This thesis also introduce the Korean courts' trends about Valuing damages in personal injury actions awarded for gratuitously rendered nursing and medical care.
목차
1. 전체 손해 배상 청구 가능
2. 설명의무위반으로 인한 재산상 손해와 정신적 손해를 모두 인정한 예
3. 위자료 배상액 산정의 기준
4. 가족들의 위자료 배상청구 가능 여부
II. 기회상실과 손해배상
1. 위자료를 제외한 소극적, 적극적 손해배상 여부
III. 현저히 불성실한 진료의 위자료 배상
참고문헌
ABSTRACT