earticle

영어

Wang Long-shi and Luo Jin-shi were two outstanding followers of Wang Yang-ming. Both maintain the doctrine of “xian-zai liang-zhih”（virtue in presenting）, only articulate it in different modes. According to the comment of Hwang Tzong-shi, Long-shi’s written words is better than his speech, and Jin-shi’s speech is better than his words. This comment apparently does not reach to the level of thought. Mou Tzong-san holds that the thoughts of Wang Long-shi are more transcendental and more aloof, however, the thoughts of Luo Jin-shi are more refreshing, penetrating and comprehensive. Although this view can delineate the stylistic difference of their thoughts, but the essential differences of their thoughts are still in the dark. This study professes to undertake a comprehensive comparison of the modes of thoughts of the two philosophers, including the manifold aspects of their teaching styles, their visions of the ontological substance and their theories of cultivation as a whole, in order to present a more clear picture of the genealogical development of the school of WangYang-ming.

중국어

王龍溪與羅近溪並稱王門「二溪」，兩人皆主張「見在良知」之說，不過表現出來的思想形態卻有所不同。根據黃宗羲的評論：「龍溪筆勝舌，近溪舌勝筆。」由此吾人可以得知龍溪文筆比口才好，而近溪口才比文筆好。然而僅僅依據這兩句描摩兩人才調的評語，似乎很難窺知彼二者在思想形態方面究竟有何異同。對此，牟宗三先生嘗評論道：「如果以羅近溪與王龍溪相比，王龍溪較為高曠超潔，而羅近溪則更為清新俊逸，通透圓熟。」這樣的說法似乎已能勾勒出二者思想風格的差異，但是具體的內涵又是什麼呢？依筆者所知，目前學界對於王門二溪思想之比較研究，似乎仍停留在類似上述這樣簡括評論的階段，至於全面性地展開兩者思想形態之比較研究，似乎仍未之見。這對於王陽明之後兩個最重要流派的代表人物彼此之間思想同異的了解，不能說沒有遺憾。因此，如果能對於二溪之思想形態，包括論學風格、本體觀、工夫論等諸多面向，進行更為全面的比較研究，應當更能彰顯陽明後學義理開展之豐富與精微，從而使吾人對於整個陽明心學譜系有更為清楚而深入的了解。