earticle

영어

Recent global terrorism is increasing the risk mitigation and financial transactions of terrorist financing, etc. The procurement of domestic financial institutions could serve as a path of increasing anti-terrorism and terrorist organizations for the collapse of the terrorist organization behind flowing 'Tracking funds' by taking off the circulation more effectively prevent terrorist on a need "for the purpose of intimidating funding legislation on the prohibition of activities are currently being implemented. Winter December 21, 2007 the law was enacted in December 2008 from 22 law enforcement are known as' ban on terrorist financing, also known as being called of terrorist acts and terrorist financing and to prevent blocking of funds For information about the implementation of domestic law can be said for the legal unit. However, the kind that, despite recent government enacted anti-money laundering and international organizations (FATF) on October 15, 2009 in central South Korea international organizations, anti-money laundering (FATF) to join as full members on the occasion, South Korea full member of FATF reasonably related to the system will continue to get developed, the claims have been highlighted. That is the kind that enacted and ratified the UN at country Czech integral February 9, 2004, the International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Financing (International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing terrorism) only to implement the remaining aspects of the law and the completeness With improvements in human rights aspects and should be complemented with is being pointed out. The current ban on funding for public funding, and intimidation prohibited recruitment target of terrorist acts are sanctioned by the United Nations on the other hand (UN) and the terrorist actors such as terrorist organizations provided funding for the ban because of the crime target range widened, and related frozen funds need to do is improve the system of 'money laundering or terrorist financing agreement based on the amount of transaction reporting steps to abolish the lower and more active and aggressive measures to order are possible. However, the kind that was established in the administrative disposition due to excessive serious side effects have been predicted in the human rights aspects of the conflicting parties and excessive regulatory system because it is apparent controversial counter-terrorism and weapons of mass destruction(WMD) to prevent the spread of The Thief of financial measures can understand the need for more careful discussion and review are needed to show.

한국어

우리나라가 2004년 2월 17일 서명, 비준한 「테러자금 조달의 억제를 위한 국제협약」을 이행하기 위한 법적 장치가 요구됨에 따라 2008년 12월 22일 테러자금조달행위를 금지하기 위한 「공중 등 협박목적을 위한 자금조달행위의 금지에 관한 법률」이 제정 되어 시행되고 있다. 이 법은 제정초기 「테러자금조달금지법」의 명칭으로 법률안이 국회에 제출되었으나 ‘테러’에 관한 개념정의의 모호성과 인권침해 우려 등으로 많은 논란 끝에 ‘테러자금’이라는 용어대신 ‘공중 등 협박자금(공중협박자금)’이라는 용어를 사용하여 본 법의 명칭으로 제정되게 되었다. 그러나 본 법률은 제정 당시 입법 목적의 정당성 논란이 있었음에도 불구하고 최근에는 테러자금에 대한 금융제재 강화 필요성을 국제자금세탁방지기구(FATF)등이 지적함에 따라 법률을 더욱 강화하는 방향으로 개정 방안을 검토하고 있어 이로 인한 논란이 예상되고 있다. 따라서 본고에서는 테러자금억제를 위한 효율적 수단이라는 인식하에 법적장치로서 시행되고 있는 동법률내용의 정당성과 문제점 및 보완방안에 대해 재검토하고자 하였다. 국민의 기본권 보호라는 측면에서 우려되고 논란이 되고 있기도 하나 테러활동의 배후에 흐르면서 자양분의 역할을 하고 있는 테러자금의 차단은 더 이상 양보할 수 없는 사항이라 할 수 있기 때문에 오히려 동법률은 더욱 보완되고 강화될 필요가 있다고 생각된다.