earticle

영어

We are sure that North Korea had made decision of amendment of constitutional law in its peril of regime crisis in general. The fourth amendment of constitutional law in 1972, 1992, 1998, and 2009 have been paid attention to a changed status of both the national defence commission and the comrade since 1972. There are concerned with the transition of a decision maker on the most important national matters either autocrator or commission in constitutional law.
Now the political leadership in North Korea rely upon the military power because of its military regime, and we could confirm the same feature of a military government such as that of chinese constitutional law in 1954 and 1982, and the Coup D'etat of south Korea in 1961 and that of North Korea in 1998. In detail, I would like to analysis the subject of making decision and accountability such as same and different points between the national defence commission in north korea and the national reconstruction supreme commission in South Korea.
North Korea made amended the Constitutional Law which Kim's regime has tried to make contact with America and China and Japan on concerned with the solution of nuclear problem between North korea and USA in according to the Kim Jung Il's accountability. So this paper is concerned with the positive analysis and evaluation of a enforceable system and methods of public power in Constitutional law of North Korea.
Those enforcement systems and styles of public powers in North Korea have been contrasted with the rule of law in a state of constitutional law today. North Korea. In particular, unofficial institutions such as a command of Chosun labor party and directives of the highest officers shall surpass those of official institutions i.e. of Chosun legal codes and civil laws on the terms of the binding force of norms. So I made efforts to examine the characters of those unofficial institutions as the directives in constitutional law.