원문정보
A critical assessment on the colonial duality of Kyungsung(Keijō)
식민도시 경성의 이중도시론에 대한 비판적 고찰
초록
영어
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the colonial duality of Kyungsung(Keijō) was a constructed reality. To achieve this purpose, two kinds of analyses were executed. In the first analysis, how and why the Japanese colonizer constructed the imaginative colonial duality of Kyungsung(Keijō) was revealed. Japanese imperial Othering was the epistemological origin of the colonial dual city and the Government General of Korea's ethnic discrimination policies were the materialization of the colonial dual city discourse. Among the GGK's policies, dual place naming was the most powerful spatial policy of the duality construction. As the second analysis, the population census was analyzed and the diversity and variability of inner structure of colonial Seoul were revealed. Newly designed inner city model of Kyungsung(Keijō) could detect the diversity of the city structure. Mixed area of Korean and Japanese and Chinese ghetto in Kyungsung(Keijō) could be revaluated by the new model.
목차
II. 식민도시 이중도시론의 인식론적 기원
1. 제국주의적 타자구성과 이분법
2. 제국주의적 이분법의 구체화
III. 이중도시론의 구체화로써 식민주의적 지명 부여
1. 하나의 도시 두 개의 지명
2. 행정구역 개편과 이중적 지명부여
3. 식민정부의 이중적 지명부여의 의도
4. 이중도시 심상지리의 확산
IV. 인구자료로 파악한 京城 내부 구조의 다양성
1. 식민도시 京城 이중도시론의 한계
2. 다양성과 변동성의 도시 京城
3. 잡거지와 식민지적 상호 작용
V. 結論
참고문헌
ABSTRACT