earticle

영어

This article seeks to support the existence of at least two means of reading the work of Émile Benveniste. The first one is widely spread and corroborated by a great part of academics who are interested in this author, the other one is still little known and it’s characterized by the fact that it opens the linguist’s doctrine to external viewpoints. To uphold this point of view, we bring forth the study of Dany-Robert Dufour (2000) as we present his notions of binarity and trinity and these ones in relation to structuralism, movement upon which Benveniste had great influence and from which he was read by the linguists that belong to enunciation field. We propose a dislocation of Dufour’s study in order to verify how this concurrence of two ways of organizing the reasoning has an incidence upon the reading of Benvenistian work. We get to the conclusion that the coexistence of those two faces of Benveniste leads to an important question: how can we have linguistics analysis that allies the two of them? We leave this theme as an invitation for those who are interested in continuing Benveniste’s reflections about language.