earticle

영어

This study is to examine how we will actually understand the records of the early times in Samkuksaki(『三國史記』). First of all, this saw how a angle of disbelief in them was formed and have been changed, and then whether the records of "Dong-i chon"(｢東夷傳｣) in the Samgukchi(『三國志』) were trusted which were used to deny early records of Samkuksaki. And by trying to more actively interpret early records of Samkuksaki, the thesis is to push the button of the transformation of perception that we should newly interpret them. For early history of establishments of the Three-Kingdoms in the surveys of Korean history, history of Shilla was recorded to skip suddenly from founder Park Hyeokgeose(朴赫居世) in 57 B.C. to 17th Nea-mul Maripkan(奈勿麻立干: 356∼402), history of Goguryeo from founder King Dong-myeong(東明王) in 37 B.C. to 6th King Tea-Cho(太祖王: 53∼146) and history of Baekje from founder King On-cho(溫祚王) in 18 B.C. to King Ko-I(古爾王). Contemporary records of "Silla-bonki"(｢新羅本紀｣), "Goguryeo-bonki"(｢高句麗本紀｣) and "Baekje-bonki"(｢百濟本紀｣) in the Samkuksaki were quite rich, and recorded dynamic and varied appearances of Three-Kingdoms. Nevertheless, early history of Three-Kingdoms in the surveys of Korean history was neglected. For most Korean historians mainly avoided that age with accepting the disbelief in early history as the orthodoxy of Korean history. Although some records were mentioned, they were treated as history of Sam-Han(三韓) on the basis of "Dong-i chon" or early histories of Samkuksaki were seen as the later age's articles after Japanese analyzed and readjusted contemporary records' chronology(紀年). Because this phenomenon was influenced by a view of disbelief in early records of Samkuksaki which was produced to limit, distort and obliterate Korean history in the end of 19th. In this manner, they modified the king genealogy(王系) and chronology of Three Kingdoms, analyzed some of records with other records, and reformed early records of Samkuksaki. This, however, was based on the records of “Dong-i chon” in the Samgukchi. After all, they could not believe early records of Samkuksaki in themselves, and thus reform them according to the contents of “Dong-i chon”. While we distrusted the early records of Samkuksaki and denied the history of Three-Kingdoms, Chinese and Japanese have taken up this historical blank, distorted the Korean history and stolen Korea`s ancient history. Accordingly, we need the transformation of perception that we accept positively and interpret the early records of Samkuksaki, and thereby require to fill up the blank in history of Three-Kingdoms.