earticle

논문검색

쟁의행위에 대한 가처분의 유형과 한계

원문정보

The study on Types and Limitations of Provisional Disposition in Industrial Actions

정승규

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

Union workers have a right to withhold their labor, that is to strike including stoppage of work, concerted slowdown or other concerted interruption of operations by employees. Hence, as a general principle, employers can't penalize employees or discriminate against them because they exercised the right to strike. Strikers who engage in certain types of unlawful conduct lose their statutory right or regal protection. Moreover employers may institute injuction(provisional disposition) as a major legal tool to combat unionism. Some authors have suggested that injunctions against strikes issued by court may protect the sanctity of labor contracts against the threat of union interference. But constitutionnal spirits force us to recognize the benefits of collective bargaining, outlaw the yellow-dog contracts, remove labor-management disputes from the threat of national court injunctions. Among other things, when such an injunction is issued, there must be rigorous limitations upon the availability of injunctions in labor disputes. The right of worker's strike is guranteed by a contitutional law, it admits the use of force in legal system. If so, the imployer's counteractions are admitted within of law system. this spirits should be understood as a appearance of not civil law but labor laws.

목차

I. 서설
 II. 쟁의행위에 대한 가처분의 요건
  1. 피보전권리
  2. 보전의 필요성
 III. 징의행위에 대한 가처분의 유형
  1. 직장점거와 가처분
  2. 피켓팅과 가처분
  3. 생산관리와 가처분
  4. 작업중지권행사와 가처분
  5. 기타 영업방해행위와 가처분
 IV. 쟁의행위에 대한 가처분의 한게
  1. 쟁의행위에 대한 가처분의 일반적 한계
  2. 쟁의행위의 유형에 따른 가처분의 개별적 한계
 V. 결론
 참고문헌
 Abstract

저자정보

  • 정승규 Jeong, seung-kyou. 청주대학교 법과대학 교수

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 8,200원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.