원문정보
초록
영어
Union workers have a right to withhold their labor, that is to strike including stoppage of work, concerted slowdown or other concerted interruption of operations by employees. Hence, as a general principle, employers can't penalize employees or discriminate against them because they exercised the right to strike. Strikers who engage in certain types of unlawful conduct lose their statutory right or regal protection. Moreover employers may institute injuction(provisional disposition) as a major legal tool to combat unionism. Some authors have suggested that injunctions against strikes issued by court may protect the sanctity of labor contracts against the threat of union interference. But constitutionnal spirits force us to recognize the benefits of collective bargaining, outlaw the yellow-dog contracts, remove labor-management disputes from the threat of national court injunctions. Among other things, when such an injunction is issued, there must be rigorous limitations upon the availability of injunctions in labor disputes. The right of worker's strike is guranteed by a contitutional law, it admits the use of force in legal system. If so, the imployer's counteractions are admitted within of law system. this spirits should be understood as a appearance of not civil law but labor laws.
목차
II. 쟁의행위에 대한 가처분의 요건
1. 피보전권리
2. 보전의 필요성
III. 징의행위에 대한 가처분의 유형
1. 직장점거와 가처분
2. 피켓팅과 가처분
3. 생산관리와 가처분
4. 작업중지권행사와 가처분
5. 기타 영업방해행위와 가처분
IV. 쟁의행위에 대한 가처분의 한게
1. 쟁의행위에 대한 가처분의 일반적 한계
2. 쟁의행위의 유형에 따른 가처분의 개별적 한계
V. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
