earticle

논문검색

Literature

金達寿의 「族譜」를 통해 본 근대 한국인의 민족의식의 경계

원문정보

A Warning of Modern Korean's a national identity Reflected on in 「A Pedigree」 by Dalsoo Kim

서기재, 김순전

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

In accordance with the national strategy, Choseon people had to be transformed and absorbed into Japanese people excluding their national identity to which they had already adapted. Many Choseon people who did not have enough sense of nationalism or a strong will against Japanese colonialism as protesters against it had were in the middle of the stream of harsh measures. In his book, A Pedigree, Dalsoo Kim describes common characteristics of the Choseon at that time in which they were intended or unconscious. He shows them by describing delicate shades of psychology of Kyungtae who is a main character with preference for straying. In the book, despite the character still loves new culture of that time or civilization, he cannot help being attracted by a traditional culture of Choseon when encountering with it. Kim’s awareness of the fact that he was a Korean who lived in Japan might/must drive him to become a writer of Chosen nationalism later.

일본어

「族譜」が発表された1940年頃日本は国民国家の形成論理として、日本は単一民族であり、天皇の統治する国家という神話が盲目的に受け止められた。彼らがいう‘帝国日本’の中には朝鮮人と他の植民地の民族も含まれていた。この民族達も‘完全な日本人’になるしかならなかった。植民地の民族は自分に親しまれた環境に順応しながら生成された民族性を徹底的に排除して新しい‘民族’として自分を受け止めなければならなかった。
独立闘士のような徹底的な思想も、教育も、意志ももたなかった、まさしく‘平凡’な人々は‘皇国臣民化’を盲信する帝国日本の政策のさなかにおかれていた。そのような個人の心理は意図的であったかなかったかに関係なしに浮游する精神の持ち主としての「族譜」の主人公である敬泰を通して現われる。敬泰兄弟と村の人々は、当時‘新文化’や‘新文明’を欲望しながらも、その文化の主体になれない朝鮮民族の心理を的確に表した。金達寿が戦後、民族作家になれたのはおそらく日本の民族性に自然に吸収されてしまう朝鮮国籍の<中間者>という自己認識から起ったものではなかろうか。自分の浮游する民族意識の定着地を求めようとする努力であったと思われる。

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 「族譜」의 가능성
 Ⅲ. 조선을 바라보는 ‘他者’의 시선
 Ⅳ. ‘1940년’과 족보의 의미
 Ⅴ. 떠도는 조선, 조선인--「族譜」의 민족의식을 묻다
 Ⅵ. 결론
 【參考文獻】
 <要旨>
 Abstract

저자정보

  • 서기재 건국대학교 아시아디아스포라연구소 연구원, 일본근대문학 및 문화 전공
  • 김순전 전남대학교 교수, 일본근대문학 전공

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 5,500원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.