초록 열기/닫기 버튼
목적 한국의 디자인씽킹 연구 동향을 조사하고 향후 연구 방향을 제시하고자 하였다. 방법 2000년 이후 발간된 디자인씽킹 관련 총 337건의 논문 바탕으로 연도별, 학술지별 현황 및 연구방법에 따라 연구동향을 살펴보았으며, 빅데이터 분석 프로그램 텍스톰과 Ucinet6 넷드로(NetDraw) 기능을 통해 키워드와 관련된 단어들 사이의 네트워크를시각화 및 단어의 유사군집을 도출하기 위해 CONCOR분석을 실시하였다. 결과 첫째, 디자인씽킹 연구가 본격적으로 진행된 것은 2010년 중반부터이며, 이때부터 관련 연구물들이 급증한 것으로 나타났으며, 총 80종에 이르는 학술지에 게재되었으나 주요하게 7종의 학술지에 10편이상의 관련 연구들이 수록되었다. 337편이 연구중양적연구가 80.7%로 가장 두드러졌으며, 다음으로는 이론연구(11.8%), 혼합연구(3.85%), 질적연구(2.67%) 순이었다. 둘째, 키워드 네트워크 분석을 통해 가장 많이 사용된 핵심어는 ‘창의성’, ‘융합’, ‘문제해결’, ‘과정’, ‘교육’, ‘학습’ 등이었다. Ucinet6 넷드로(NetDraw)을 통한 클러스터에서는 디자인씽킹을 지칭하는 정의 키워드가 주요집단이었고, 학제간 융합의 필요성과 당위성 영역이 주변 집단으로 집결되는 결과가 도출되었다. 결론 창의성과 융합, 문제해결의 측면에서 디자인씽킹이 강조되고 있으며, 광의적 측면의 디자인씽킹에 대한 정의는 존재하지만연구자의 관점에 따라 실행방법이 상이하다. 따라서 이를 표준화하려는 시도와 후속연구가 필요하다.
Objectives This study aims to investigate the design thinking research trends in Korea and suggest future research directions. To achieve this purpose, a total of 337 papers related to design thinking published since 2000 were collected. Methods Based on the collected research papers, research trends were examined by year and journal status and research methods, and networks between keyword-related words were analyzed through Big Data analysis program Textom and Ucinet6 NetDraw functions. visualized. In addition, CONCOR analysis was performed to derive similar clusters of derived words. Results The study results are summarized as follows. First, design thinking research began in earnest in mid-2010, and the number of related studies has increased rapidly since then. became Among the 337 studies, quantitative research was the most prominent with 80.7%, followed by theoretical research (11.8%), mixed research (3.85%), and qualitative research (2.67%). Second, through keyword network analysis, the most used key words were ‘creativity’, ‘convergence’, ‘problem solving’, ‘process’, ‘education’, and ‘learning’. In the cluster through Ucinet6 NetDraw, the defining keyword that refers to design thinking was the main group, and the need for interdisciplinary convergence and justification areas were gathered into the surrounding group. Conclusions The implication of this is that, although related studies are published every year, most studies are still microscopic and one-off program types are the main focus, so from a long-term perspective, reorganization of the curriculum is inevitable, and methodological reliability is required. As can be seen from the textom analysis, design thinking is emphasized in terms of creativity, convergence, and problem solving, and although there is a definition of design thinking in a broad sense, it is standardized in that the implementation method is different depending on the researcher's point of view. Attempts and follow-up studies are needed.
키워드열기/닫기 버튼
design thinking, trend analysis, textorm analysis, big data
