초록 열기/닫기 버튼

This study aimed to recognize the problem of “practing literature” education as a literary education paradox and discuss ways to properly deal with it. “practising literature” is regarded as the content that drives the practice of literature in the learner's life and is set as a major agenda for literature education. However, the specific viewpoint or method for realizing “practising literature” education is still ambiguous. Therefore, this study attempted to secure a concrete perspective that enables the such education to function fully by confirming its orientation and its status in literary education. From this perspective, this study attempted to establish a core mechanism for realizing “practising literature” education. The perspective of “practising literature” education that this study intends to focus on os that it is a literary education paradox, and this education is currently positioned as an antithesis of literary education. To readdress this paradox, the study developed a mothod that recognizes “practising literature” as a “transit point” of literature education, and penetrates literature and leap through literature simultaneously by using the “pleasure” of literature and the “rite of passage” of literature as the core mechanisms.