초록 열기/닫기 버튼
This paper is to study and analyze some important cases held by the recent Korean Supreme Court. This paper debates the explanation duty of an insurer as applied to insurance coverage disputes. Courts and most scholars have argues for the soul of contract law. Under the traditional contract theory, the assent of both parties to the terms of an agreement is necessary for creation of an enforceable contract. Provisions excluding or limiting coverage, according to the theory, would not be enforceable because of "substantialness". However, it is very difficult to discern the substantial clause and the non-substantial. And so forth, this paper also explorers some the point at issues of insurance law. In this Paper, I enunciate some suggestions of the reasonable theory to our debate about the legal nature of insurance policy. The Supreme Court construed the related matters, and this paper clarified the holding.
키워드열기/닫기 버튼
Insurance Policy, Protection of Insured, Adhesion Contract, Duty to Explain, Insurance Accident, Indemnity Clauses, Insured
