초록 열기/닫기 버튼

As checking on Myths of creation in Mongol, Korea and central-Eastern Europe, it is possible to dig out some common aspects of their development process. Myths of creation in central-Eastern Europe show a diversity of an aspect concerning the development of them beingassociated with Bible and A forged Bible of Christianity. In this regard, it is also possible to weigh the relation between Myths of creation in Mongol, Korea and Sutra against a case of Central-Eastern Europe. As a result, I'd say it is possible to set up four aspects of their development process. First, I think the original aspect of a Myth of creation is transmitted on the basis of two roots, which is ① the cooperative world creation of Supreme Diety and Devil, or Devil's world creation by an Supreme Diety's order and ② a competing with world possession betweenSupreme Diety and Devil. Second, Myth of creation go through two routes of change and reformation in development process being influenced by general religion's Bible and a forged Bible and exerting influence to a general religion's forged Bible inversely. Third, as the case may be, insignificant influences do not make Myth of creationgo through important changes in general meaning of it. Finally, Myth of creation also go through some changes and reformations by phased association of specific religion in the process of original development.


As checking on Myths of creation in Mongol, Korea and central-Eastern Europe, it is possible to dig out some common aspects of their development process. Myths of creation in central-Eastern Europe show a diversity of an aspect concerning the development of them beingassociated with Bible and A forged Bible of Christianity. In this regard, it is also possible to weigh the relation between Myths of creation in Mongol, Korea and Sutra against a case of Central-Eastern Europe. As a result, I'd say it is possible to set up four aspects of their development process. First, I think the original aspect of a Myth of creation is transmitted on the basis of two roots, which is ① the cooperative world creation of Supreme Diety and Devil, or Devil's world creation by an Supreme Diety's order and ② a competing with world possession betweenSupreme Diety and Devil. Second, Myth of creation go through two routes of change and reformation in development process being influenced by general religion's Bible and a forged Bible and exerting influence to a general religion's forged Bible inversely. Third, as the case may be, insignificant influences do not make Myth of creationgo through important changes in general meaning of it. Finally, Myth of creation also go through some changes and reformations by phased association of specific religion in the process of original development.