이 연구는 한반도와 역내의 평화체제구축에 대한 현실적인 대안을 모색하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 한반도 차원의 안보적 갈등과 동아시아 차원에서의 전략적 경쟁이 점증하고 있는 현 상황은 한반도와 역내의 ‘평화체제’ 수립의 당위성에 대해 제기하고 있다. 이 글에서는 ‘전쟁상태’, ‘소극적 평화’, ‘불안정한 평화’를 관리하기 위한 질서의 틀로서 ‘레짐’이라는 개념을, 그리고 ‘영구평화’, ‘적극적 평화’, ‘안정된 평화’상태를 유지달성하기 위한 제도적 틀로서 ‘안보 공동체’라는 개념을 적용하고 있다. 또한, ‘안보공동체’로의 직접적인 이행보다는 안보레짐이라는 낮은 단계의 제도화를 통해 높은 단계의 ‘안보 공동체’ 또는 ‘다자간 평화공동체’의 토대를 마련하는 것이 현실적이라 판단하고 있다. 이에 따라, 동북아에서 실현될 안보레짐은 ‘협조체제’로서, ‘강대국협조체제’가 아닌 ‘민주적 평화협조체제’이다. ‘6자회담’의 진화된 형태로서의 ‘동북아협조체제’는 ‘비핵지대의 호’와 연계하여 ‘광역 동아시아’의 평화프로세스로 발전되어야 한다.

The purpose of this research is to seek a practical alternative for the establishment of the peace regime in the Korean peninsular and Northeast Asia. Given the current situation that the security conflict in the Korean peninsular has been gradually increased and the strategic rivalry in East Asia has been visualized, it would be appropriate to suggest the establishment of the peace regime in the Korean peninsular and Northeast Asia. This paper defines the 'regime' as a frame for the regional order which manages state of war, negative peace and unstable peace, and the 'security regime' as an institutional frame for the achievement and maintenance of the status of Paix Perpetuelle, positive peace and stable peace. Further, this paper suggests that it is more realistic to lay the foundation for the high level institutions such as the security community or the multilateral peace community by establishing a low level institution such as the security regime rather than pursue a direct implementation of the security community. In this regard, this paper maintains that the security regime for Northeast Asia should be a 'Concert regime' which is a democratic-peace Concert, not a Concert of great powers. Therefore, it is conclusive that the Concert of Northeast Asia which is evolved from the Six Party-Talks should be developed as a peace process for the Greater East Asia in conjunction with the Arc of Nuclear-Weapon-Free-Zones.

The purpose of this research is to seek a practical alternative for the establishment of the peace regime in the Korean peninsular and Northeast Asia. Given the current situation that the security conflict in the Korean peninsular has been gradually increased and the strategic rivalry in East Asia has been visualized, it would be appropriate to suggest the establishment of the peace regime in the Korean peninsular and Northeast Asia. This paper defines the 'regime' as a frame for the regional order which manages state of war, negative peace and unstable peace, and the 'security regime' as an institutional frame for the achievement and maintenance of the status of Paix Perpetuelle, positive peace and stable peace. Further, this paper suggests that it is more realistic to lay the foundation for the high level institutions such as the security community or the multilateral peace community by establishing a low level institution such as the security regime rather than pursue a direct implementation of the security community. In this regard, this paper maintains that the security regime for Northeast Asia should be a 'Concert regime' which is a democratic-peace Concert, not a Concert of great powers. Therefore, it is conclusive that the Concert of Northeast Asia which is evolved from the Six Party-Talks should be developed as a peace process for the Greater East Asia in conjunction with the Arc of Nuclear-Weapon-Free-Zones.

G2, Concert of Northeast Asia, Nuclear Weapon Free Zones, Peace, Security Regime, Security Community